Menu

Revolutionære feminister som hader mænd

khr-05-assange

Jeg vil benytte 8 marts som anledning til at tage et emne op som har naget mig et stykke tid: Voldtægtsanklagen mod Assange.

Hvis jeg ellers kan overholde min egen personlige deadline, vil dette weblog-indlæg blive publiceret den 8 marts, kvindernes internationale kampdag. I skrivende stund er det faktisk 8. marts, men klokken er kun 3:50. Jeg skal nok nå det.

Assange er anklaget for doppelt voldtægt. Lad os lige se på hvad han faktisk står anklaget for.

Den første kvindes anklage, her omtalt som Miss A:

Her account to police, which Assange disputes, stated that he began stroking her leg as they drank tea, before he pulled off her clothes and snapped a necklace that she was wearing. According to her statement she "tried to put on some articles of clothing as it was going too quickly and uncomfortably but Assange ripped them off again". Miss A told police that she didn't want to go any further "but that it was too late to stop Assange as she had gone along with it so far", and so she allowed him to undress her.

According to the statement, Miss A then realised he was trying to have unprotected sex with her. She told police that she had tried a number of times to reach for a condom but Assange had stopped her by holding her arms and pinning her legs. The statement records Miss A describing how Assange then released her arms and agreed to use a condom, but she told the police that at some stage Assange had "done something" with the condom that resulted in it becoming ripped, and ejaculated without withdrawing.


Anklagen fra den anden kvinde, Miss W:

The following day, Miss W phoned Assange and arranged to meet him late in the evening, according to her statement. The pair went back to her flat in Enkoping, near Stockholm. Miss W told police that though they started to have sex, Assange had not wanted to wear a condom, and she had moved away because she had not wanted unprotected sex. Assange had then lost interest, she said, and fallen asleep. However, during the night, they had both woken up and had sex at least once when "he agreed unwillingly to use a condom".

Early the next morning, Miss W told police, she had gone to buy breakfast before getting back into bed and falling asleep beside Assange. She had awoken to find him having sex with her, she said, but when she asked whether he was wearing a condom he said no. "According to her statement, she said: 'You better not have HIV' and he answered: 'Of course not,' " but "she couldn't be bothered to tell him one more time because she had been going on about the condom all night. She had never had unprotected sex before."

Kilde: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/17/julian-assange-sweden

Begge kvinder havde gjort det meget klart at de på ingen måde var interesseret i at han stak den ind uden beskyttelse. Men i det ene tilfælde ventede han til hun var faldet i søvn før han stak den ind. I det andet tilfælde fik han kondomet til at springe.

Humlen er altså at det ikke var frivilligt. Det han er anklaget for er ikke samleje uden kondom. Det er derimod samleje uden kondom med en sovende kvinde, vel vidende at dette sker mod hendes vilje.

Men begge kvinder havde på et tidspunkt indvilliget i at dyrke sex med ham. Kan man vinkle dette til, at det han er anklaget for er frivilligt sex?

Jo se nu bare her -- James D Catlin, en af Assanges advokater, udtalte:

»The consent of both women to sex with Assange has been confirmed by prosecutors,«

Dette er i sig selv sandt nok: begge kvinder havde tidligere indvilliget i at dyrke sex med Assange. Det advokaten glemmer at nævne er, at det ikke er det frivillige sex som hans klient står anklaget for, men derimod den efterfølgende voldtægt. Men hvis man blot læser det, lyder det som om Assange står anklaget for at have dyrket frivillig sex.

Hvis man så glemmer det der med den sovende kvinde, og går ud fra at kondomet bare sprang ved et uheld, så har man en rigtig god historie om en mystisk lov i Sverige, der gør det ulovligt at dyrke frivilligt sex uden gummi:

http://slatest.slate.com/id/2276690/

En anden af Assanges advokater, Mark Stephen, påstod at »Assange is wanted not for allegations of rape, as previously reported, but for something called ‘sex by surprise.’«

Okay, og hvad betyder så sex by surprise? Det er, viser det sig, en oversættelse af det svenske överraskningssex, som er et slangudtryk der faktisk betyder ... voldtægt. Jeg har ret svært ved at tro på at forsvarsadokaten virkelig fandt det pågældene ord i en officel tekst i forbindelse med en doppelt voldtægtssag.

Læs mere her:

http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/12/06/some-thoughts-on-sex-by-surprise/


Tidligere Wikileaks-talsmand Daniel Domscheit-Berg har skrevet bogen Inside Wikileaks. Her skriver han følgende om Julian Assange, som passer foruroligende godt til anklagerne:

Jeg sad ofte i større grupper og lyttede til Julian der pralede med hvor mange børn han var far til i forskellige dele af verden. Han syntes at kunne lide ideen om massevis af små Julian'er, en på hvert kontinent. Hvorvidt han tog sig af disse postulerede børn, eller om de overhovedet eksisterede, var et åbent spørgsmål.

KILDE: http://cryptome.org/0003/ddb-book/ddb-book.htm


I starten hævdede Assange at der var tale om en CIA-konspiration. Den 21 august tweetede han under Wikileak-navnet: »We were warned to expect ‘dirty tricks’. Now we have the first one.«
den 22 august tweetede han igen: »Reminder: US intelligence planned to destroy WikiLeaks as far back as 2008.«
Interview med Assange i Aftonbladet: »We have been warned that the Pentagon, for example, is thinking of deploying dirty tricks to ruin us.«

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/21731247584

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/21822519941

http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article7654862.ab

Senere gik han bort fra det med konspirationen. Nu handlede det i stedet om militaristiske feminister. De hader jo mænd, det ved enhver.

Assange kom med dette guldkorn: "Sweden is the Saudi Arabia of feminism, (...) I fell into a hornets' nest of revolutionary feminism."

http://feministing.com/2010/12/28/julian-assange-says-%E2%80%9Csweden-is-the-saudi-arabia-of-feminism%E2%80%9D-and-he-is-a-victim-of-%E2%80%9Crevolutionary-feminism%E2%80%9D/

Hvor bogstaveligt skal vi opfatte Assanges beskrivelse af Sverige som et, øh, feministisk Saudi-arabien? Man ville umiddelbart tro at han han talte i meget overført betydning. Selv da er det åndssvagt. Men i et andet interview omtaler intervieweren i en sidebemærkning  Sverige som "A civiliced country, not a banana republic". Dette får Assange til at bryde ind bemærkningen: "A bit more of a banana republic"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9309000/9309320.stm

En tredie af Assanges teorier er at kvinderne slet ikke havde lyst til at anklage ham for voldtægt, men blev presset til det af de onde betjente:

“The suggestion is they went to the police for advice and they did not want to make a complaint. What they say is that they found out they were mutual lovers of mine, and they had unprotected sex, and they got into a tizzy about whether there was a possibility of sexually transmitted diseases, and they went to the police to have a test … A ridiculous thing to go to the police about,”
“One of the witnesses, one of the friends of one of those women, she says that one of the women states that she was bamboozled into this by police and others. These women may be victims in this process.”

KONKLUSION

Lad os lige opsummere: To revolutionære feminister har efter frivilligt indgået samleje med Assange anklaget denne for ikke at bruge kondom, hvilket er forbudt i Bananrepublikken Sverige, som er feministisk på sådan en Saudi-arabien agtig måde, men kvinderne ville i virkeligheden ikke anklage ham for voldtægt men gik blot til politiet for at få en aids-test, og Assange er i hvert fald ikke anklaget for voldtægt, men blot for "sex by surprise". Nåja, og så er det hele en konspiration som CIA står bag!

Læs mere her:

http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/12/07/julian_assange_rape_accuser_smeared/index.html

 

CC0
To the extent possible under law, Kasper Hviid has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to Revolutionære feminister som hader mænd . This work is published from: Denmark.

Edit: Jeg har valgt at lade teksten være public domain, det vil sige, alle kan bruge og misbruge den 100% frit.

Log In

Log in with Facebook

Forgot your password? / Forgot your username?